Ticket #24 (new enhancement)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 22 months ago

Particle Mesh Size units

Reported by: simonsb Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone:
Keywords: sieve mesh "particle size" Cc:

Description

Much soil sampling and geochemistry data uses particle mesh sieves to sort the sample and catagorises the fraction by the "mesh size" (see eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_(scale), http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=1417. The UCUM standards at http://aurora.regenstrief.org/~ucum/ucum.html specify a "mesh" value "mesh lineic number [mesh_i][MESH_I][in_i]" but this does not appear to be related.

Is there an appropriate "mesh" unit available in UCUM?

Attachments

mesh sizes.ppt (510.0 KB) - added by simonsb 3 years ago.
Table showing various mesh sizes
seive.xls (22.5 KB) - added by SimonCox 22 months ago.
Spreadsheet of seive openings mapped to various seive number designations (taken from the other attachment)

Change History

follow-up: ↓ 2   Changed 3 years ago by gschadow

This is similar to Gauge scales. Please provide a conversion function and a proposal for a unit symbol, then we could add this. If it's just some ordinal scale, then it would not need a unit.

Changed 3 years ago by simonsb

Table showing various mesh sizes

in reply to: ↑ 1   Changed 3 years ago by simonsb

Replying to gschadow:

This is similar to Gauge scales. Please provide a conversion function and a proposal for a unit symbol, then we could add this. If it's just some ordinal scale, then it would not need a unit.

The only UCUM reference I can find is to gauge of catheters: Charrière, french gauge of catheters Ch [Ch] [CH] no 1 mm/[pi]

I understand from the attached table that the Mesh Size is a different unit of measure.

  Changed 3 years ago by SimonCox

On further investigation, I believe that Lineic number is correct. It is defined as inverse length - i.e. number per unit length. I think all mesh numbers are a scaled inverse-length, so are a lineic number. It just requires the scale factor to be determined.

  Changed 2 years ago by gschadow

Could be inverse length or inverse circumference or even more complicated. I have once tried to understand needle gauge numbers but had to give up because I could not find a clear definition. This will go into UCUM almost automatically as soon as someone can research a formula -- however complicated -- that relates these gauges or mesh sizes to a standard unit in some way.

Changed 22 months ago by SimonCox

Spreadsheet of seive openings mapped to various seive number designations (taken from the other attachment)

  Changed 22 months ago by SimonCox

The attached spreadsheet shows that the seive designations are not a strict Unit of Measure, as the relationship between numbers and opening size cannot be expressed as a formula. The British scale is close - (British seive number) = 15300/opening(expressed in um)

but in general seive numbers are an ordered-nominal scale, nit a unit-of-measure.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.